↓ Skip to main content

Feeling out of control: a qualitative analysis of the impact of bipolar disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Feeling out of control: a qualitative analysis of the impact of bipolar disorder
Published in
Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, September 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01786.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bipolar disorder is a chronic and recurrent disorder with fluctuating symptoms. Few patients with bipolar disorder experience a simple trajectory of clear-cut episodes, with recovery typically occurring slowly over time. The chronic and disabling course of the disorder has a marked impact on the person's functioning and relationships with others. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of bipolar disorder on the lives of people diagnosed with this disorder. The method used was a general inductive qualitative approach. Twenty-one participants were interviewed between 2008 and 2009 about how they had experienced the impact of bipolar disorder. The interviews were audio-taped and transcribed. The core theme that emerged was the participants were feeling out of control. Their own reactions and the reactions of others to the symptoms of bipolar disorder contributed to this core theme. The core theme was constituted by feeling overwhelmed, a loss of autonomy and felling flawed. Mental health nurses can help facilitate a sense of personal control for people with bipolar disorder by exploring what the symptoms mean for that person and implementing strategies to manage the symptoms, address social stigma and facilitate active involvement in treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 44 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 47 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2012.
All research outputs
#28,600,579
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing
#1,328
of 1,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,916
of 173,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.