↓ Skip to main content

Integration of genome-wide association studies with biological knowledge identifies six novel genes related to kidney function

Overview of attention for article published in Human Molecular Genetics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Integration of genome-wide association studies with biological knowledge identifies six novel genes related to kidney function
Published in
Human Molecular Genetics, September 2012
DOI 10.1093/hmg/dds369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel I. Chasman, Christian Fuchsberger, Cristian Pattaro, Alexander Teumer, Carsten A. Böger, Karlhans Endlich, Matthias Olden, Ming-Huei Chen, Adrienne Tin, Daniel Taliun, Man Li, Xiaoyi Gao, Mathias Gorski, Qiong Yang, Claudia Hundertmark, Meredith C. Foster, Conall M. O'Seaghdha, Nicole Glazer, Aaron Isaacs, Ching-Ti Liu, Albert V. Smith, Jeffrey R. O'Connell, Maksim Struchalin, Toshiko Tanaka, Guo Li, Andrew D. Johnson, Hinco J. Gierman, Mary F. Feitosa, Shih-Jen Hwang, Elizabeth J. Atkinson, Kurt Lohman, Marilyn C. Cornelis, Åsa Johansson, Anke Tönjes, Abbas Dehghan, Jean-Charles Lambert, Elizabeth G. Holliday, Rossella Sorice, Zoltan Kutalik, Terho Lehtimäki, Tõnu Esko, Harshal Deshmukh, Sheila Ulivi, Audrey Y. Chu, Federico Murgia, Stella Trompet, Medea Imboden, Stefan Coassin, Giorgio Pistis, CARDIoGRAM Consortium, ICBP Consortium, the CARe Consortium, WTCCC2, Tamara B. Harris, Lenore J. Launer, Thor Aspelund, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Braxton D. Mitchell, Eric Boerwinkle, Helena Schmidt, Margherita Cavalieri, Madhumathi Rao, Frank Hu, Ayse Demirkan, Ben A. Oostra, Mariza de Andrade, Stephen T. Turner, Jingzhong Ding, Jeanette S. Andrews, Barry I. Freedman, Franco Giulianini, Wolfgang Koenig, Thomas Illig, Christa Meisinger, Christian Gieger, Lina Zgaga, Tatijana Zemunik, Mladen Boban, Cosetta Minelli, Heather E. Wheeler, Wilmar Igl, Ghazal Zaboli, Sarah H. Wild, Alan F. Wright, Harry Campbell, David Ellinghaus, Ute Nöthlings, Gunnar Jacobs, Reiner Biffar, Florian Ernst, Georg Homuth, Heyo K. Kroemer, Matthias Nauck, Sylvia Stracke, Uwe Völker, Henry Völzke, Peter Kovacs, Michael Stumvoll, Reedik Mägi, Albert Hofman, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Fernando Rivadeneira, Yurii S. Aulchenko, Ozren Polasek, Nick Hastie, Veronique Vitart, Catherine Helmer, Jie Jin Wang, Bénédicte Stengel, Daniela Ruggiero, Sven Bergmann, Mika Kähönen, Jorma Viikari, Tiit Nikopensius, Michael Province, Shamika Ketkar, Helen Colhoun, Alex Doney, Antonietta Robino, Bernhard K. Krämer, Laura Portas, Ian Ford, Brendan M. Buckley, Martin Adam, Gian-Andri Thun, Bernhard Paulweber, Margot Haun, Cinzia Sala, Paul Mitchell, Marina Ciullo, Stuart K. Kim, Peter Vollenweider, Olli Raitakari, Andres Metspalu, Colin Palmer, Paolo Gasparini, Mario Pirastu, J. Wouter Jukema, Nicole M. Probst-Hensch, Florian Kronenberg, Daniela Toniolo, Vilmundur Gudnason, Alan R. Shuldiner, Josef Coresh, Reinhold Schmidt, Luigi Ferrucci, David S. Siscovick, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Ingrid B. Borecki, Sharon L.R. Kardia, Yongmei Liu, Gary C. Curhan, Igor Rudan, Ulf Gyllensten, James F. Wilson, Andre Franke, Peter P. Pramstaller, Rainer Rettig, Inga Prokopenko, Jacqueline Witteman, Caroline Hayward, Paul M Ridker, Afshin Parsa, Murielle Bochud, Iris M. Heid, W.H. Linda Kao, Caroline S. Fox, Anna Köttgen

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 127 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Professor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Other 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Computer Science 7 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,422,295
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#6,603
of 8,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,825
of 192,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#66
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.