↓ Skip to main content

Risk screening methods for extreme heat: Implications for equity-oriented adaptation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk screening methods for extreme heat: Implications for equity-oriented adaptation
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0240841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 45 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 15%
Engineering 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 47 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,216,908
of 32,430,365 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,233
of 216,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,586
of 463,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#279
of 3,057 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,430,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,057 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.