You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Source attribution of human echinococcosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008382 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul R. Torgerson, Lucy J. Robertson, Heidi L. Enemarkx, Junwei Foehr, Joke W. B. van der Giessen, Christian M. O. Kapel, Ivana Klun, Chiara Trevisan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#17,470,971
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#7,352
of 9,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,504
of 435,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#147
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.