↓ Skip to main content

Glissant and the middle passage: philosophy, beginning, abyss

Overview of attention for article published in Postcolonial Studies, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glissant and the middle passage: philosophy, beginning, abyss
Published in
Postcolonial Studies, November 2020
DOI 10.1080/13688790.2020.1832213
Authors

Jonathan Pugh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,651,328
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Postcolonial Studies
#202
of 277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,663
of 420,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Postcolonial Studies
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.