↓ Skip to main content

Changes in Anopheles funestus Biting Behavior Following Universal Coverage of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets in Benin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Changes in Anopheles funestus Biting Behavior Following Universal Coverage of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets in Benin
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2012
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jis565
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Behavioral modification of malaria vectors in response to vector control methods is of great concern. We investigated whether full coverage of long-lasting insecticide-treated mosquito nets (LLINs) may induce a switch in biting behavior in Anopheles funestus, a major malaria vector in Africa.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Madagascar 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 411 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 19%
Student > Master 70 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 4%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 92 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 10%
Environmental Science 25 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 3%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 104 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2025.
All research outputs
#764,452
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#617
of 19,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,511
of 225,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#4
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.