| Title |
COVID-19 treatments and pathogenesis including anosmia in K18-hACE2 mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2943-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 9% |
| Japan | 9 | 5% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 108 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 154 | 90% |
| Scientists | 12 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 370 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 11% |
| Researcher | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 13% |
| Unknown | 146 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 34 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 58 | 16% |
| Unknown | 156 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2026.
All research outputs
#268,086
of 34,641,161 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#14,079
of 118,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,938
of 473,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#288
of 904 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,641,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 904 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.