| Title |
Academic incentives for enhancing faculty engagement with decision-makers—considerations and recommendations from one School of Public Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-020-00629-1 |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 5 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,996,994
of 30,005,126 outputs
Outputs from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#425
of 3,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,316
of 443,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#23
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,005,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.