↓ Skip to main content

Condom type may influence sexual behavior and ejaculation and complicate the assessment of condom functionality

Overview of attention for article published in Contraception, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Condom type may influence sexual behavior and ejaculation and complicate the assessment of condom functionality
Published in
Contraception, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Studies that evaluate condom effectiveness are affected by factors related to how the condom was used, and these factors may not be consistent between different types of condoms. Also, subjective assessments of the sexual act may be unreliable.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Hungary 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Psychology 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,452,006
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Contraception
#2,903
of 3,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,335
of 174,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contraception
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.