↓ Skip to main content

Pyrite discs in coal: Evidence for fossilized bacterial colonies

Overview of attention for article published in Geology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pyrite discs in coal: Evidence for fossilized bacterial colonies
Published in
Geology, January 2001
DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0047:pdicef>2.0.co;2
Authors

Gordon Southam, Ravin Donald, Astrid Röstad, Cyndi Brock

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 58%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#4,275
of 4,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,946
of 114,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#64
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.