| Title |
Successful containment to date of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in the Northern Territory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Journal of Australia, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5694/mja2.50840 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas M Douglas, Ella M Meumann, Vicki L Krause, Jane Davies, for the Northern Territory COVID‐19 Response Group |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 64% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,250,238
of 32,658,522 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#1,241
of 7,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,933
of 461,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#31
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,658,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.