↓ Skip to main content

皮脂欠乏症(乾皮症)について―皮脂欠乏症の定義とその治療課題―

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
皮脂欠乏症(乾皮症)について―皮脂欠乏症の定義とその治療課題―
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, December 2019
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.129.2763
Authors

菊地 克子, 五十嵐 敦之, 加藤 則人, 生駒 晃彦, 金久保 暁, 照井 正

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#16,591,848
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#160
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,213
of 473,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.