You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to identify win–win interventions that benefit human health and conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-020-00640-z |
| Authors |
Skylar R. Hopkins, Susanne H. Sokolow, Julia C. Buck, Giulio A. De Leo, Isabel J. Jones, Laura H. Kwong, Christopher LeBoa, Andrea J. Lund, Andrew J. MacDonald, Nicole Nova, Sarah H. Olson, Alison J. Peel, Chelsea L. Wood, Kevin D. Lafferty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Sweden | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 64% |
| Scientists | 11 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,174,242
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#567
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,550
of 384,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#25
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 126.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.