| Title |
Association of COVID-19 Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Communication, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Hornik, Ava Kikut, Emma Jesch, Chioma Woko, Leeann Siegel, Kwanho Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 247 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 87 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 44 | 18% |
| Psychology | 23 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 104 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,421,456
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Health Communication
#149
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,170
of 528,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Communication
#8
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.