↓ Skip to main content

Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization across Major Histological Types of Pediatric Brain Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
127 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization across Major Histological Types of Pediatric Brain Cancer
Published in
Cell, November 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Petralia, Nicole Tignor, Boris Reva, Mateusz Koptyra, Shrabanti Chowdhury, Dmitry Rykunov, Azra Krek, Weiping Ma, Yuankun Zhu, Jiayi Ji, Anna Calinawan, Jeffrey R. Whiteaker, Antonio Colaprico, Vasileios Stathias, Tatiana Omelchenko, Xiaoyu Song, Pichai Raman, Yiran Guo, Miguel A. Brown, Richard G. Ivey, John Szpyt, Sanjukta Guha Thakurta, Marina A. Gritsenko, Karl K. Weitz, Gonzalo Lopez, Selim Kalayci, Zeynep H. Gümüş, Seungyeul Yoo, Felipe da Veiga Leprevost, Hui-Yin Chang, Karsten Krug, Lizabeth Katsnelson, Ying Wang, Jacob J. Kennedy, Uliana J. Voytovich, Lei Zhao, Krutika S. Gaonkar, Brian M. Ennis, Bo Zhang, Valerie Baubet, Lamiya Tauhid, Jena V. Lilly, Jennifer L. Mason, Bailey Farrow, Nathan Young, Sarah Leary, Jamie Moon, Vladislav A. Petyuk, Javad Nazarian, Nithin D. Adappa, James N. Palmer, Robert M. Lober, Samuel Rivero-Hinojosa, Liang-Bo Wang, Joshua M. Wang, Matilda Broberg, Rosalie K. Chu, Ronald J. Moore, Matthew E. Monroe, Rui Zhao, Richard D. Smith, Jun Zhu, Ana I. Robles, Mehdi Mesri, Emily Boja, Tara Hiltke, Henry Rodriguez, Bing Zhang, Eric E. Schadt, D.R. Mani, Li Ding, Antonio Iavarone, Maciej Wiznerowicz, Stephan Schürer, Xi S. Chen, Allison P. Heath, Jo Lynne Rokita, Alexey I. Nesvizhskii, David Fenyö, Karin D. Rodland, Tao Liu, Steven P. Gygi, Amanda G. Paulovich, Adam C. Resnick, Phillip B. Storm, Brian R. Rood, Pei Wang, Children’s Brain Tumor Network, Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, Alicia Francis, Allison M. Morgan, Angela J. Waanders, Angela N. Viaene, Anna Maria Buccoliero, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Carina A. Leonard, Cassie N. Kline, Chiara Caporalini, Christopher R. Kinsinger, Chunde Li, David E. Kram, Derek Hanson, Elizabeth Appert, Emily A. Kawaler, Eric H. Raabe, Eric M. Jackson, Jeffrey P. Greenfield, Gabrielle S. Stone, Gad Getz, Gerald Grant, Guo Ci Teo, Ian F. Pollack, Jason E. Cain, Jessica B. Foster, Joanna J. Phillips, July E. Palma, Karen A. Ketchum, Kelly V. Ruggles, Lili Blumenberg, Macintosh Cornwell, Sarmady, Marcin J. Domagalski, Marcin P. Cieślik, Mariarita Santi, Marilyn M. Li, Matthew J. Ellis, Matthew A. Wyczalkowski, Meghan Connors, Mirko Scagnet, Nalin Gupta, Nathan J. Edwards, Nicholas A. Vitanza, Olena M. Vaske, Oren Becher, Peter B. McGarvey, Ron Firestein, Sabine Mueller, Samuel G. Winebrake, Saravana Mohan Dhanasekaran, Shuang Cai, Sonia Partap, Tatiana Patton, Toan Le, Travis D. Lorentzen, Wenke Liu, William E. Bocik

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 368 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 17%
Researcher 57 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 5%
Student > Master 20 5%
Other 14 4%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 139 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 93 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 10%
Chemistry 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 145 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2024.
All research outputs
#429,951
of 34,436,843 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#2,214
of 19,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,297
of 569,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#58
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,436,843 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 569,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.