| Title |
Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase suppresses SARS-CoV-2 replication by blocking membrane fusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2012197117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruochen Zang, James Brett Case, Eylan Yutuc, Xiucui Ma, Sheng Shen, Maria Florencia Gomez Castro, Zhuoming Liu, Qiru Zeng, Haiyan Zhao, Juhee Son, Paul W. Rothlauf, Alex J. B. Kreutzberger, Gaopeng Hou, Hu Zhang, Sayantan Bose, Xin Wang, Michael D. Vahey, Kartik Mani, William J. Griffiths, Tom Kirchhausen, Daved H. Fremont, Haitao Guo, Abhinav Diwan, Yuqin Wang, Michael S. Diamond, Sean P. J. Whelan, Siyuan Ding |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 158 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 17% |
| France | 18 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 87 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 130 | 82% |
| Scientists | 19 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 197 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 74 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 79 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#499,637
of 34,528,520 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8,115
of 119,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,701
of 570,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#170
of 1,009 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,528,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 570,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,009 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.