You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical Study of a Sodium Azide Poisoning Cluster
|
---|---|
Published in |
NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2001
|
DOI | 10.3893/jjaam.12.125 |
Authors |
Yasuo Hirose, Koujirou Hata, Hiraki Honda, Yoshihiko Yamazaki, Yasushi Hori, Mitsuru Oseki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,529,698
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#46
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,402
of 115,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.