Kathleen N. Fenton, William M. Novick, John W. Entwistle, Susan D. Moffatt-Bruce, Robert M. Sade, David Blitzer, Charles C. Canver, Andrea J. Carpenter, DuyKhanh P. Ceppa, Edward P. Chen, Robbin G. Cohen, Thomas A. D’Amico, Daniel H. Drake, John W. Entwistle, Paul W. Fedak, Kathleen N. Fenton, Leslie J. Kohman, Matthias Loebe, John E. Mayer, Martin F. McKneally, Walter H. Merrill, Scott J. Millikan, Susan D. Moffatt-Bruce, Sudish C. Murthy, Keith S. Naunheim, Mark B. Orringer, Allan Pickens, Shuddhadeb Ray, Jennifer C. Romano, Robert M. Sade, Sandra L. Starnes, Julie A. Swain, James S. Tweddell, Richard I. Whyte, Joseph B. Zwischenberger
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Login
to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#666,266
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#20
of 3,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,121
of 416,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#2
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.