↓ Skip to main content

Guideline for the Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Children With Cancer and/or Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
436 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Guideline for the Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Children With Cancer and/or Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2012
DOI 10.1200/jco.2012.42.7161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 426 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 73 17%
Student > Postgraduate 65 15%
Researcher 56 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 7%
Other 104 24%
Unknown 72 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 277 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 87 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,438,060
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#3,955
of 32,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,358
of 226,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#25
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.