↓ Skip to main content

Atmospheric Pco2 Perturbations Associated with the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Atmospheric Pco2 Perturbations Associated with the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province
Published in
Science, February 2011
DOI 10.1126/science.1199011
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The effects of a large igneous province on the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (PCO₂) are mostly unknown. In this study, we estimate PCO₂ from stable isotopic values of pedogenic carbonates interbedded with volcanics of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) in the Newark Basin, eastern North America. We find pre-CAMP PCO₂ values of ~2000 parts per million (ppm), increasing to ~4400 ppm immediately after the first volcanic unit, followed by a steady decrease toward pre-eruptive levels over the subsequent 300 thousand years, a pattern that is repeated after the second and third flow units. We interpret each PCO₂ increase as a direct response to magmatic activity (primary outgassing or contact metamorphism). The systematic decreases in PCO₂ after each magmatic episode probably reflect consumption of atmospheric CO₂ by weathering of silicates, stimulated by fresh CAMP volcanics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 14 15%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 36 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2025.
All research outputs
#1,204,089
of 29,988,864 outputs
Outputs from Science
#20,905
of 88,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,988
of 134,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#83
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,988,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.