↓ Skip to main content

Interpersonal Circumplex Profiles Of Persistent Depression: Goals, Self‐Efficacy, Problems, And Effects Of Group Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interpersonal Circumplex Profiles Of Persistent Depression: Goals, Self‐Efficacy, Problems, And Effects Of Group Therapy
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology, July 2016
DOI 10.1002/jclp.22343
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We assessed severely and persistently depressed patients' interpersonal self-efficacy, problems, and goals, plus changes in interpersonal functioning and depression during 20 weeks of group therapy. Outpatients (32 female, 26 male, mean age = 45 years) completed interpersonal circumplex measures of goals, efficacy, and problems before completing 20 weeks of manualized group therapy, during which we regularly assessed depression and interpersonal style. Compared to normative samples, patients lacked interpersonal agency, including less self-efficacy for expressive/assertive actions; stronger motives to avoid conflict, scorn, and humiliation; and more problems with being too submissive, inhibited, and accommodating. Behavioral Activation and especially Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy interventions produced improvements in depression and interpersonal agency, with increases in "agentic and communal" efficacy predicting subsequent decreases in depression. While severely and persistently depressed patients were prone to express maladaptive interpersonal dispositions, over the course of group therapy, they showed increasingly agentic and beneficial patterns of cognitions, motives, and behaviors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Other 5 5%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 38 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 42 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2018.
All research outputs
#21,540,108
of 27,265,018 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology
#571
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,858
of 332,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,265,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.