↓ Skip to main content

霞ヶ浦の生態系サービスの享受量の変遷及び代替法による経済評価

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology and Civil Engineering, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
霞ヶ浦の生態系サービスの享受量の変遷及び代替法による経済評価
Published in
Ecology and Civil Engineering, November 2020
DOI 10.3825/ece.23.217
Authors

Tatsumi KITAMURA, Shin-ichiro S. MATSUZAKI, Koji NISHI, Shun-ichi MATSUMOTO, Takahiro KUBO, Hiroya YAMANO, Satoshi KOUHUKU, Kokoro KIKUCHI, Naoko YOSHIMURA, Takehiko FUKUSHIMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,916,691
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#15
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,404
of 529,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.