| Title |
The challenges of implementing low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Cancer, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s43018-020-00142-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Edelman Saul, Raquel B. Guerra, Michelle Edelman Saul, Laercio Lopes da Silva, Gabriel F. P. Aleixo, Raquel M. K. Matuda, Gilberto Lopes |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 35% |
| Brazil | 9 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 48% |
| Scientists | 8 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#676,631
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cancer
#235
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,317
of 569,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cancer
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 569,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.