↓ Skip to main content

ncVarDB: a manually curated database for pathogenic non-coding variants and benign controls

Overview of attention for article published in Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ncVarDB: a manually curated database for pathogenic non-coding variants and benign controls
Published in
Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation, December 2020
DOI 10.1093/database/baaa105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#24,769,705
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation
#833
of 1,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,289
of 569,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 569,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.