↓ Skip to main content

Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Shnabel and Nadler (2008), Study 4

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Shnabel and Nadler (2008), Study 4
Published in
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, November 2020
DOI 10.1177/2515245920917334
Authors

Erica Baranski, Ernest Baskin, Sean Coary, Charles R. Ebersole, Lacy E. Krueger, Ljiljana B. Lazarević, Jeremy K. Miller, Ana Orlić, Matthew R. Penner, Danka Purić, Sean C. Rife, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Aaron L. Wichman, Iris Žeželj

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,656,702
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#162
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,779
of 414,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 81.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.