↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of several PM2.5 forecast models using data collected during the ICARTT/NEAQS 2004 field study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of several PM2.5 forecast models using data collected during the ICARTT/NEAQS 2004 field study
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, March 2007
DOI 10.1029/2006jd007608
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Norway 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 81 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 29%
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 16%
Engineering 9 10%
Chemistry 5 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,376,321
of 33,918,391 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#3,052
of 16,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,570
of 129,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#38
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,918,391 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.