| Title |
Assessment of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York City
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26881 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gbenga Ogedegbe, Joseph Ravenell, Samrachana Adhikari, Mark Butler, Tiffany Cook, Fritz Francois, Eduardo Iturrate, Girardin Jean-Louis, Simon A. Jones, Deborah Onakomaiya, Christopher M. Petrilli, Claudia Pulgarin, Seann Regan, Harmony Reynolds, Azizi Seixas, Frank Michael Volpicelli, Leora Idit Horwitz |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 190 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 76 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Ghana | 2 | 1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 83 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 149 | 78% |
| Scientists | 24 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 258 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 22% |
| Unknown | 88 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Unknown | 104 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 649. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#42,485
of 34,592,533 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#536
of 15,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,173
of 570,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#12
of 431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,592,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 114.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 570,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.