↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Nitrate Supplementation Improves Revascularization in Chronic Ischemia

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dietary Nitrate Supplementation Improves Revascularization in Chronic Ischemia
Published in
Circulation, September 2012
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.112.112912
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Revascularization is an adaptive repair mechanism that restores blood flow to undersupplied ischemic tissue. Nitric oxide plays an important role in this process. Whether dietary nitrate, serially reduced to nitrite by commensal bacteria in the oral cavity and subsequently to nitric oxide and other nitrogen oxides, enhances ischemia-induced remodeling of the vascular network is not known.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,753,749
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#6,726
of 21,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,649
of 188,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#54
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.