↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patient-reported wellbeing and clinical disease measures over time captured by multivariate trajectories of disease activity in individuals with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the UK: a multicentre prospective longitudinal study
Published in
The Lancet Rheumatology, December 2020
DOI 10.1016/s2665-9913(20)30269-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie J W Shoop-Worrall, Kimme L Hyrich, Lucy R Wedderburn, Wendy Thomson, Nophar Geifman, CAPS the CLUSTER Consortium, Eileen Baildam, Michael Barnes, Michael W Beresford, Emil Carlsson, Alice Chieng, Coziana Ciurtin, Gavin Cleary, Joyce Davidson, Fatjon Dekaj, Sally-Anne Dews, Andrew Dick, Gil Diogo, Teresa Duerr, Joanna Fairlie, Helen Foster, Jenna F Gritzfeld, Yiannis Ioannou, Beth Jebson, Melissa Kartawinata, Toby Kent, Aline Kimonyo, Saskia Lawson-Tovey, Wei-Yu Lin, Paul Martin, Flora McErlane, Fatema Merali, Andrew Morris, Helen Neale, Jessica Neisen, Sandra Ng, Elizabeth Ralph, Athimalaipet V Ramanan, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Emily Robinson, Samantha Smith, Emma Sumner, Damian Tarasek, Chris Wallace, Zoe Wanstall, Annie Yarwood

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,048,390
of 33,076,184 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Rheumatology
#398
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,976
of 564,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Rheumatology
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,076,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 564,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.