↓ Skip to main content

The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives

Overview of attention for article published in Argumentation, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives
Published in
Argumentation, October 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10503-020-09540-0
Authors

Jennifer Schumann, Sandrine Zufferey, Steve Oswald

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 4 36%
Psychology 2 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Philosophy 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,996,133
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Argumentation
#134
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,954
of 412,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Argumentation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.