| Title |
A comparison of anesthetic protective barriers for the management of COVID‐19 pediatric patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Paediatric Anaesthesia, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/pan.14103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Lee‐Archer, Daniel Boyd, Trung Du, Robert Elliott, Cameron Graydon, Neil Paterson, Lidia Morawska |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#24,788,767
of 34,412,533 outputs
Outputs from Paediatric Anaesthesia
#1,890
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,458
of 569,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paediatric Anaesthesia
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,412,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 569,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.