↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Accuracy of fine‐needle aspiration and imaging in the preoperative workup of salivary gland mass lesions treated surgically
Published in
The Laryngoscope, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/lary.23613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 56%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,627,642
of 27,094,762 outputs
Outputs from The Laryngoscope
#1,562
of 7,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,694
of 192,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Laryngoscope
#20
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,094,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.