↓ Skip to main content

Biofuels That Cause Land-Use Change May Have Much Larger Non-GHG Air Quality Emissions Than Fossil Fuels

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biofuels That Cause Land-Use Change May Have Much Larger Non-GHG Air Quality Emissions Than Fossil Fuels
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, September 2012
DOI 10.1021/es301851x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 98 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 27%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Master 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 26%
Engineering 11 10%
Energy 7 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,753,767
of 32,554,826 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#7,458
of 24,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,607
of 217,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#77
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,554,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.