| Title |
Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Related Urban Planning and Development Concepts: How Are They Perceived and Utilized in Australia?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/joitmc6040187 |
| Authors |
Tan Yigitcanlar, Nayomi Kankanamge, Massimo Regona, Andres Ruiz Maldonado, Bridget Rowan, Alex Ryu, Kevin C. Desouza, Juan M. Corchado, Rashid Mehmood, Rita Yi Man Li |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 746 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 746 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 44 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 4% |
| Researcher | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 97 | 13% |
| Unknown | 450 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 66 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 53 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 46 | 6% |
| Engineering | 41 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 60 | 8% |
| Unknown | 462 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,611,990
of 28,869,144 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
#38
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,463
of 539,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,869,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 539,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.