↓ Skip to main content

Patients, procedures, and PPE: Safe office-based anesthesia recommendations in the COVID-19 era

Overview of attention for article published in Bailliere's Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Article details
Title
Patients, procedures, and PPE: Safe office-based anesthesia recommendations in the COVID-19 era
Published in
Bailliere's Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology, November 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history

Loading chart data

Monthly Attention Score data from August 2022 to July 2025. Daily data from 25 July 2025.

An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.

No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.

Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 28 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 29 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,688,391
of 34,539,236 outputs
Outputs from Bailliere's Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology
#122
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,836
of 568,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bailliere's Best Practice & Research, Clinical Anaesthesiology
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,539,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 568,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.