↓ Skip to main content

Testing the efficacy and comparability of ZooMS protocols on archaeological bone

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Proteomics, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Testing the efficacy and comparability of ZooMS protocols on archaeological bone
Published in
Journal of Proteomics, December 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.104078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wang Naihui, Brown Samantha, Ditchfield Peter, Hebestreit Sandra, Kozilikin Maxim, Luu Sindy, Wedage Oshan, Grimaldi Stefano, Chazan Michael, Horwitz Kolska Liora, Spriggs Matthew, Summerhayes Glenn, Shunkov Michael, Richter Korzow Kristine, Douka Katerina

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 29 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 32 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,131,655
of 29,953,888 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Proteomics
#99
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,131
of 539,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Proteomics
#6
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,953,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 539,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.