| Title |
Pay gaps in medicine and the impact of COVID-19 on doctors' careers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32671-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 49 | 28% |
| United States | 28 | 16% |
| Australia | 6 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 74 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 124 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 17% |
| Scientists | 15 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2024.
All research outputs
#339,676
of 34,331,336 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#3,362
of 51,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,575
of 568,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#77
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,331,336 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 568,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.