| Title |
Towards a coordinated strategy for intercepting human disease emergence in Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Microbe, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2666-5247(20)30220-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristian M Forbes, Omu Anzala, Colin J Carlson, Alyson A Kelvin, Krutika Kuppalli, Eric M Leroy, Gael D Maganga, Moses M Masika, Illich M Mombo, Dufton M Mwaengo, Roch F Niama, Julius Nziza, Joseph Ogola, Brad S Pickering, Angela L Rasmussen, Tarja Sironen, Olli Vapalahti, Paul W Webala, Jason Kindrachuk |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 61% |
| Scientists | 13 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 24% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#934,124
of 32,444,503 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Microbe
#250
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,159
of 544,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Microbe
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,444,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 544,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.