↓ Skip to main content

北海道におけるオジロワシHaliaeetus albicillaの風力発電用風車への衝突事故の現状(<特集>風力発電が生態系に与える影響を考える)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
北海道におけるオジロワシHaliaeetus albicillaの風力発電用風車への衝突事故の現状(<特集>風力発電が生態系に与える影響を考える)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, January 2018
DOI 10.18960/hozen.17.1_85
Authors

白木 彩子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#159
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,019
of 452,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.