↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic biomaterials: toward engineering autonomous feedback

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dynamic biomaterials: toward engineering autonomous feedback
Published in
Current Opinion in Biotechnology, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.032
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dynamic biomaterials are biocompatible engineered systems capable of sensing and actively responding to their surrounding environment. They are of growing interest, both as models in basic research to understand complex cellular systems and in medical applications. Here, we review recent advances in nano-scale and micro-scale biomaterials, specifically artificial cells consisting of compartmentalized biochemical reactions and biologically compatible hydrogels. These dynamic biomaterials respond to stimuli through triggered reactions, reaction cascades, logic gates, and autonomous feedback loops. We outline the advances and remaining challenges in implementing such 'smart' biomaterials capable of autonomously responding to environmental stimuli.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Chemistry 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Materials Science 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#9,109,885
of 28,494,563 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#1,528
of 2,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,661
of 318,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#39
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,494,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.