Resolution of Neurotoxicity and β-Cell Toxicity in an Islet Transplant Recipient following Substitution of Tacrolimus with MMF

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Transplantation, June 2017

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 1 policy source

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Resolution of Neurotoxicity and β-Cell Toxicity in an Islet Transplant Recipient following Substitution of Tacrolimus with MMF
Published in	Cell Transplantation, June 2017
DOI	10.3727/000000006783981639
Pubmed ID	28849974
Authors	Tatiana Froud, David A. Baidal, Gaston Ponte, Jacqueline V. Ferreira, Camillo Ricordi, Rodolfo Alejandro

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2008.

All research outputs

#7,641,993

of 23,269,984 outputs

Outputs from Cell Transplantation

#561

of 1,789 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#121,245

of 317,480 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cell Transplantation

#114

of 380 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.