You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rare Earths: Market Disruption, Innovation, and Global Supply Chains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of Energy & the Environment, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085700 |
| Authors |
Roderick Eggert, Cyrus Wadia, Corby Anderson, Diana Bauer, Fletcher Fields, Lawrence Meinert, Patrick Taylor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 11% |
| Engineering | 20 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 73 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,844,355
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Energy & the Environment
#283
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,607
of 318,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Energy & the Environment
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.