↓ Skip to main content

Hospitalist‐led medicine emergency department team: Associations with throughput, timeliness of patient care, and satisfaction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hospital Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hospitalist‐led medicine emergency department team: Associations with throughput, timeliness of patient care, and satisfaction
Published in
Journal of Hospital Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/jhm.1957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Smitha R. Chadaga, Lee Shockley, Angela Keniston, Nancy E. Klock, Susan Van Dyke, Quin Davis, Eugene S. Chu

Abstract

Admitted patients boarding in the emergency department (ED) leads to hospital diversion. Active bed management and care for boarded patients can improve throughput. We developed a hospital medicine ED (HMED) team to participate in active bed management, and to care for boarded patients, to decrease diversion and improve throughput.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Master 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Psychology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,669,533
of 32,583,832 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hospital Medicine
#607
of 2,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,161
of 205,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hospital Medicine
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,583,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.