↓ Skip to main content

Potentially negative ecological consequences of animal redistribution on beaches during COVID-19 lockdown

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Potentially negative ecological consequences of animal redistribution on beaches during COVID-19 lockdown
Published in
Biological Conservation, January 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108926
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 34 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 39 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#10,716,021
of 32,777,751 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,978
of 8,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,223
of 561,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#95
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,777,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 561,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.