You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Bayesian framework for assessing extinction risk based on ordinal categories of population condition and projected landscape change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108866 |
| Authors |
Daniel B. Fitzgerald, Andrew R. Henderson, Kelly O. Maloney, Mary C. Freeman, John A. Young, Amanda E. Rosenberger, David C. Kazyak, David R. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,801,337
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,479
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,279
of 519,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#78
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.