↓ Skip to main content

Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process—Fourth Edition

Overview of attention for article published in American journal of occupational therapy, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,705)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
podcasts
10 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
2784 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process—Fourth Edition
Published in
American journal of occupational therapy, August 2020
DOI 10.5014/ajot.2020.74s2001
Pubmed ID

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,784 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2772 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 340 12%
Student > Master 209 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 108 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 3%
Researcher 56 2%
Other 251 9%
Unknown 1728 62%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 567 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 173 6%
Social Sciences 59 2%
Unspecified 30 1%
Psychology 29 1%
Other 154 6%
Unknown 1772 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2026.
All research outputs
#560,708
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from American journal of occupational therapy
#9
of 1,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,623
of 453,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American journal of occupational therapy
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.