↓ Skip to main content

A Tractable Experimental Model for Study of Human and Animal Scabies

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Tractable Experimental Model for Study of Human and Animal Scabies
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000756
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Scabies is a parasitic skin infestation caused by the burrowing mite Sarcoptes scabiei. It is common worldwide and spreads rapidly under crowded conditions, such as those found in socially disadvantaged communities of Indigenous populations and in developing countries. Pruritic scabies lesions facilitate opportunistic bacterial infections, particularly Group A streptococci. Streptococcal infections cause significant sequelae and the increased community streptococcal burden has led to extreme levels of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Australia's Indigenous communities. In addition, emerging resistance to currently available therapeutics emphasizes the need to identify potential targets for novel chemotherapeutic and/or immunological intervention. Scabies research has been severely limited by the availability of parasites, and scabies remains a truly neglected infectious disease. We report development of a tractable model for scabies in the pig, Sus domestica.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 21 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 25 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#26,683,006
of 32,266,838 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#9,049
of 10,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,026
of 140,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#61
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,266,838 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.