The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombi: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, December 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 5 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 20 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombi: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Published in	American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, December 2020
DOI	10.1007/s40256-020-00458-2
Pubmed ID	33354748
Authors	Abdullah Al-abcha, Khader Herzallah, Yehia Saleh, Mark Mujer, Ola Abdelkarim, Mahmoud Abdelnabi, Abdallah Almaghraby, George S. Abela

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	3	60%
Egypt	1	20%
Jordan	1	20%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	3	60%
Scientists	1	20%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	1	20%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	20	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Postgraduate	2	10%
Librarian	1	5%
Student > Doctoral Student	1	5%
Student > Bachelor	1	5%
Student > Master	1	5%
Other	1	5%
Unknown	13	65%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	4	20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	2	10%
Unknown	14	70%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.

All research outputs

#6,220,422

of 23,270,775 outputs

Outputs from American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs

#130

of 437 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#150,963

of 504,512 outputs

Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs

of 8 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.

So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.