↓ Skip to main content

Methods for Integrative Research on Community Resilience to Multiple Hazards, with Examples from Italy and England

Overview of attention for article published in Procedia Economics and Finance, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Methods for Integrative Research on Community Resilience to Multiple Hazards, with Examples from Italy and England
Published in
Procedia Economics and Finance, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00938-1
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 21%
Social Sciences 19 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,642,184
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Procedia Economics and Finance
#92
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,170
of 307,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Procedia Economics and Finance
#27
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.