↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative hemodynamic PET imaging using image-derived arterial input function and a PET/MR hybrid scanner

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantitative hemodynamic PET imaging using image-derived arterial input function and a PET/MR hybrid scanner
Published in
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, July 2016
DOI 10.1177/0271678x16656200
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) with (15)O-tracers is commonly used to measure brain hemodynamic parameters such as cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen. Conventionally, the absolute quantification of these parameters requires an arterial input function that is obtained invasively by sampling blood from an artery. In this work, we developed and validated an image-derived arterial input function technique that avoids the unreliable and burdensome arterial sampling procedure for full quantitative (15)O-PET imaging. We then compared hemodynamic PET imaging performed on a PET/MR hybrid scanner against a conventional PET only scanner. We demonstrated the proposed imaging-based technique was able to generate brain hemodynamic parameter measurements in strong agreement with the traditional arterial sampling based approach. We also demonstrated that quantitative (15)O-PET imaging can be successfully implemented on a PET/MR hybrid scanner.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 15%
Physics and Astronomy 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Neuroscience 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
#1,563
of 1,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,064
of 381,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
#641
of 654 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 654 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.